Monday, January 28, 2019
Crito Analysis Essay
Rhetorical Question But my dear Crito, why should we pay so much attention to what most people think? The reasonable people, who  remove more claim to be considered, will believe that the facts are  scarcely as they are (906).Personification Consider then, Socrates, the Laws would probably continue, whether it is also  lawful for us to say that what you are trying to do to us is not right (913).Platos Crito is one of the many tremendously influential  flakes of  literature produced in ancient Greece. It is a thought-provoking, philosophical discussion regarding the role of the  individualistic within society, and how to treat injustice. As part of a series of  speculative dialogues between Socrates and other characters, Crito deals with the conflict Socrates is presented with, as he awaits execution. Crito, one of Socrates  wet friends, urges Socrates to escape prison while he still can. Crito offers several arguments to  loose his escape, including the shame he would endure from the    public for letting his friend die, and the  scurvy example it would set for the children of Athens. However, Socrates carefully analyzes each of Critos arguments for escaping, and proves them invalid  by logic and deductive reasoning. The passage, But my dear Crito, why should we pay so much attention to what most people think? The reasonable people, who  impart more claim to be considered, will believe that the facts are  only as they are (906), demonstrates the method that Socrates uses to persuade. Socrates asks a rhetorical question to  ambuscade the silliness of the Critos worries. It represents the wisdom and morals of Socrates. Critos strongest argument is that Socrates would be promoting injustice by accepting his unfair sentence. However, Socrates disproves this point as well, by reasoning that he would be harming the Law by escaping death. Socrates, who has tried to  subsist his  conduct as  right on and peacefully as possible, would be  faulting every moral he ever lived    by if he chose to  suit against the law. He regards the Law higher than his own life. He sees theLaw as a father to him it has raised him, educated him, and allowed him to live a  well-provided life. No matter how much he disagrees with its ways, he cannot bring himself to  refuse it.Throughout Socrates discussions, he often has conversations with himself and the Law. Plato personifies the Law by  great(p) it human-like qualities and speech it is suggested that the Law can be hurt, and angry. He does this to distinguish it as a character that has feelings. For example, you will leave this place, when you do, as the victim of a wrong done not by us, the Laws, but by your  confrere men. But if you leave in that dishonorable way, returning wrong from wrong, and  wicked for evil, breaking your agreements with us, and injuring those whom you least ought to injure  yourself, your country, and us ,- then you will  depend our anger (916), demonstrates the authority of the Law. Socrates sug   gests it is better to die a victim who has lived justly and killed unjustly, than to return the injustice and hurt the Laws. He states, it is never right to do a wrong or return a wrong or defend ones self against injury by  requital (911), which exemplifies the belief that injustice cannot be treated with injustice. Socrates mentions an agreement being unkept in this passage this alludes to the belief that there is a social  tackle between the individual and government. Socrates reasons that when a citizen lives in Athens, he is indirectly  keep the laws and abiding them. The individual has a moral obligation to the government. While it is  proficient to challenge the government under some circumstances, one threatens the foundation of a stable society by breaking its laws. Socrates, who has lived 70 years of Athenian life, is content by living in accordance with this contract. He feels a state simply cannot exist if laws have no power. He  hard believes in the importance of strict    laws, as he calls them the most  loved achievement of human history. Besides, he reasons that a man of his age, with little life left to live, would lose his reputation by clinging so greedily to life, at the price of violating the most stringent laws (915). For all these reasons, Crito remains an influential piece that poses big questions and promotes critical thinking.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment