The Labeling Theory

When writing my assignment I train to but my bring ining on labeling theory. The stolon article I choose base itself on how finished attaching labels to several(prenominal)s it changes societies perception of how physically charismatic they are. The author Kowner did a strain of studies to earn if this theory was true. Kowner form that not only did labels of divagation effect how charismatic an individual was but an individuals sexuality and affable state were also considered. This left hand me irresolutioning wether or not society did find deviants less(prenominal) attractive which is a question I had not recognised myself asking previously when perusing labeling theory. I found myself spirit deeper into the lives of deviants whilst indicant this article and proverb things from a different military position that hadnt already been shown to me. I discovered that when being taught near labeling theory I am simply only asked to understand it. Never am I required to put myself in the position of the deviant and this was something that whilst reading through the article I had most definitely found. In particular, I discovered that in Japan where the experiment was based that the definition of deviance alter to what it is here in the UK.\n callable to this, many would question wether the bases of the instruct are relevant or even reliable when stressful to understand how labeling theory cause those here in the UK. But, As always within sociology I find myself required to looking for beyond what is asked of us and to see further meanings of the topic in question to greater my understanding. I thought it was extremely interest that when trying to see if their dead reckoning of deviants being less attractive the researchers asked students to look at a set of photos and to rate them fit in to their attractiveness. When doing so the researchers are seeing if the students stereotypical view of someone who is deemed to be deviant fashion th at they are less attractive than someone who does not fulf...